Feature suggestions and discussion [READ THE FIRST POST]

@Background Pony
 
@Vargus  
Why are you always trying this? Aren’t three bans for this not enough?  
And for what should this feature be good anyway?
 
 
Which reminds me  

@Mad Black  
Seconded.

@Mad Black  
HMPH…..

There’s an easier solution but the mods will never do it.

@dt  
They’re all European, they don’t have guns.
 
@Mad Black  
And for what should this feature be good anyway?  
I could kinda see the point if it were done like the SA Forums, where the offending post gets left up for everyone to see; that would let it stand as a good example of a bad example, so anyone following would know what not to do.
 
…I don’t agree with that point– there’s plenty enough gorram drama around here as it is– but I can see it from here.

@TexasUberAlles  

 
I refer you to this documentary and this

Proposing we be able to edit or delete our own posts in the event that a mistake is made and the poster fails to catch it before hitting the submit button.

@Mugen Kagemaru  
Yeah, Or we say something we regret like calling vargus a stupid moron.

No one ever reads the first post.

@The Frowning Pony  
We should put a thing in there that we can instaban people that obviously didn’t read it before posting?

Topic and first post ammended.  

…  

I’m not sure if I requested this before, or has been requested otherwise. But how about an Clop Tag for explicit and questionable (and maybe suggestive ans so on) material that isn’t humanized or anthro?  
I know in the search it is pretty easy to get to the exclusive clop porn, or filter the clop out in the search for humanized or antrho porn.  
But I think for the actual filters and spoilerbility it would be very convenient to have a clop tag for better filtering. Still after two years on the site I don’t really like most of the actually clop and I would like to filter it, without this relatively complicated search terms. Especially since we have the three days top scoring on the front page which include often clop I personally don’t like.*
 
Which brings me to a second suggestion. To customized the front page. So that you can choose the systems tags on the sidebar. Maybe even switch between them… So that you can see the top scoring Safe, suggestive, questionable, explicit, grotesque and grimdark pics as you like. (And don’t see the same ass jiggling, every time you visit the front page, for a week.)
 
________  
_{At the moment there are three such pics. Which are actually just recolors of each other, to show all the mane 6 in the same position… (Sometimes I really don’t get the taste of the fandom.)}

I think it would make problems with determining what is clop and what isn’t - I mean sure intercourse would get tagged such, but I think there would be some tag wars - for example when the characters are just kissing, is it clop? It is 100% questionable, but few people could argue about the border where clop begins.

@Mad Black  
Apart from what @OrionFOTL said, there’s also the slight issue of retroactive tagging. While a batch “if it falls in this search it’s clop”, there’s still going to be a few thousand images peppered about that shouldn’t carry the tag.
 
Now, unless people volunteer to go through all those clop images to make sure they’re appropriately tagged, it’s probably not happening.

@OrionFOTL  
@The Smiling Pony  
Well I don’t see that as an actual problem.(We have tag-wars about suggestive and semi-grimdark, and it isn’t that big of an problem.) Ok there is a good definition needed, and it would take some work. But in general I think it is an good idea and nothing that couldn’t be solved.  
Since it would base on one or two searches like explicit -humanized,-anthro = clop. On this search there shouldn’t be too many pics that aren’t clop.  
On Questionable -humanized,-anthro = clop, there could be some that aren’t clop. Since questionable is one of the more vague terms here.  
Like this >>580702, but that is more because it is between suggestive and questionable territory.  
This >>580479 is more difficult since it only implies clop, and human-pony intercourse.  
But I would consider a good 90% of this search as clop.  
Maybe it would help to exclude memes and text post as well in this search. Those don’t seem like clop or fetish fuel in general.
 
If we make a little forum poll maybe we even find some volunteers for that.
 
Edit:  
I think I figured it out for the questionable tagging.  
questionable, ~~anthro, -humanized, -text, -meme, -vulgar, -idw, -equestria girls, -human, ~~/mlp/,-4chan,-barely pony related,-not pony related
 
And for Explicit,-humanized,-anthro,-human,-equestri girls,-human exhibitionism,-human nudity
 
This should include all the “Clop” material under the questionable tag. With a very little error ratio. Which is more because the vulgar tag isn’t as frequently used as it should be it seems and that the line between questionable and suggestive is pretty thin.

@Mad Black  
You tag it.

@dt  
Be actually constructive about it or stop your passive-aggressive provocation.

Indeed.

So occasionally the auto-dupe detector will show an explicit pic in a not-explicit post.
 
I guess we can’t do anything about that?

@dt  
Not really… It does still respect spoilers, though (and hidden appear spoilered).

When deleted a post instead features red text that just reads “Quack” followed by the usual message, just a stupid idea for flavor.
 
Also still wondering about that Date and Time on posts option,

Mods if there is any reason NOT to have a {user was banned for this post} feature as well as a list of public bans, please state shy as coherently as possible.

@Vargus  
Just shut the hell up, please. You aren’t getting your damn public ban lists.

@soundtea  
Why so mean-spirited, MR. Soundtea??