@Princess Luna
Thank you but “breasts so ridiculously large, they would prevent standing up” and “defy physical logic” is almost the opposite of what I intended. At least “physically impossible” is gone.
You also didn’t do anything for part 2 of my suggestion but I guess I worded that in a vague way. I mean that the definition of “impossibly large breasts” should mention/link “hyper breasts” (for torso-sized or larger), and clearly state that “hyper breasts” is actually meant to be the larger category of the two.
As for the definition as it’s now, it is very different from the previous one but feels about as non-concrete.
“Defy physical logic” seems redundant to “gravity-defying breasts” or whatever that tag was renamed into, and this size of breast can definitely be depicted with realistic physics on account of them occurring in real life. It’s also not an improvement on “anatomically impossible”. “Would prevent standing up” is definitely an escalation from the previous definition, whose exact words I can’t recall, but it did allude to less extreme hinderance to normal everyday functioning. Both parts seem like exaggerations to what the scope is supposed to be, and also exoticizing of a feature that exists on lots of real people.
Maybe I’m just reading too much into this. If you meant something like “look like they should cause trouble standing up straight”, then that sounds perfectly plausible and I’d be fine with that until an acceptable measurement can be figured out.
Actually let me try. How’s
Very very large breasts that cover most of the torso when seen from a front angle, or remain visible when seen from the back. If just one breast could block the torso from view, please use “hyper breasts”.