[NSFW] 'reverse spitroast' should imply 'threesome', 'spitroast'

reverse spitroast -> imply -> threesome , spitroast

I’d vote for No. reverse cowgirl doesn’t imply cowgirl position either. But we could follow the cowgirls’ example and add a similar “For the same position with…” to both tag descriptions.

If anything, they should imply bisexual, as many of them seem to be one guy and two girls, but that isn’t always the case, and I know that spitroast doesn’t imply that either
 
Honestly I didn’t even know these had a name tbh.
 
Threesome is all it should imply.

@Yoshimon1  
@LightningBolt  
Fair enough. I like the idea of at least referring to ‘reverse spitroast’ within ‘spitroast’s description. Wouldn’t have known about the tag if I didn’t do some digging for reference pictures.
 
I wouldn’t imply bisexual though. Reverse spitroasting can be done with all females or all males.  
*~ anything is possible if you believe ~*

Implication for “reverse spitroast” re: “threesome” still hasn’t been done :^)