Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
KilianKuro Commissions!

Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!

Description

No description provided.

Source

Comments

Syntax quick reference: **bold** *italic* ||hide text|| `code` __underline__ ~~strike~~ ^sup^ %sub%

Detailed syntax guide

Background Pony #64EA
>Twilight says book has preposterous science
 
OH, and magical myth creatures, artifacts, archaic spell enchantings AND time travelling portals ISN’T preposterous??!!
Background Pony #7752
@Inkan1969  
Fair enough. For what it’s worth I tend to give Star Wars a pass because of the fantasy elements anyway. In fact, for the most part, I won’t usually break out the scientific implausibility talk (or I’ll at least restrain it) if I feel there was a good story reason for it or it’s clear the creator wasn’t trying to depict a realistic world. Or if it’s cool enough (because the trope exists for a reason, right?). It’s the ones that try to do realism and mess up that are my main concern.
 
But the real question I have now is, are the planets on the cover of that book orbiting the orange-ish gas giant looking one, that blue dot, or a star somewhere off the cover?
Charzoid

If I saw a book with that title I would read it in a heart beat. I hope someone at least makes a fanfiction interpretation of it.
Background Pony #7752
@Background Pony #96C5
She’s one of those nit pickers that insists the science in sci-fi be 100% correct.
Hey, it can be hard to help sometimes. I’m willing to overlook a fair amount of stuff for entertainment, but I also have a degree in physics and I’ll tell you, if someone throws a hard to ignore, easily refuted, and/or blatantly wrong scientific element into a story that is supposed to represent reality, it can ruin any enjoyment I get out of the narrative, and end up being something I can’t not mention.