Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
My Little Ties crafts shop

Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!

Description

No description provided.

safe2185732 artist:dm291693 flash sentry15113 shining armor28215 pegasus501519 pony1614886 unicorn543284 g42042141 anatomy505 anatomy guide75 annihilator3 aweeg*412 chart1033 cute267417 derail in the comments366 diagram252 duo173633 frown36391 glare9072 hug37860 implied epic wife tossing1 male554767 overprotective armor70 parts of an equestria pony3 puffy cheeks5176 scared14336 sitting93342 stallion197579 wide eyes19945

Comments

Syntax quick reference: **bold** *italic* ||hide text|| `code` __underline__ ~~strike~~ ^sup^ %sub%

Detailed syntax guide

Joseph Raszagal
Wallet After Summer Sale -

Emily Brickenbrackle III
He knows, Flash. He knows well. All you can do now is hope that he approves.
 
I mean, you’re not even an alicorn. What happens if he tosses you?
V8

Subscribe to Slogoman
We’re gonna sneeze and not put our hooves over shit! And there’s nothing you can do to stop us!
Background Pony #E4E5
This amuses me, especially with how Overprotective Shining Armor is apparently choking him out. My favorite items on the list, however, are Swishy-Swasher and Alicorn Tosser.
Background Pony #54A0
@Joseph Raszagal  
(In case you should some day see this response.)  
It’s fine, I know that feel.  
The rationale behind “marrying virgins would lead to lower divorce rates” went that, if it was commonly known that men “only” married virgins, then non-virgin women would not expect to be able to marry again and would therefore be less inclined to divorce.  
Anyway, I appreciate the feedback, and am probably gonna be a while before I figure this shit out completely. Have a good one.
Joseph Raszagal
Wallet After Summer Sale -

Emily Brickenbrackle III
@AlsoSprachOdin
 
I’m going to be frank here, you made me think of something with that wall of text (no real insult intended by that, mind you). There is sort of something lost the more people you’ve been with, especially if you’ve done so casually and without great connection with your sexual partners.
 
For a while in my early 20s (26 now), I was very casual about sex and, honestly, kind of a slut. I cheated on boyfriends, indulged in more group sex that was likely safe, and generally didn’t think much of it outside of the dumb, young “Man, I’m finally free to fuck!” train of thought.
 
I was a terrible person in doing so and hurt several people who may well have cared about me. I’m not saying that casual sex is bad, by the way, but if enjoyed with the wrong mindset it can lead to a real misunderstanding of just how intimate intercourse can be.
 
I’ve been with a lot of guys, still don’t have any diseases as a result, but sometimes that does little to make me feel better for all the time I’ve wasted on just getting some dick and getting off.
 
Worse, I wasn’t even wasting my time alone. I wasted theirs too. Some of the guys I’ve fucked were interested in long-term relationships, and instead I just wanted more and more sex, continued to sleep around, and basically just shot myself in the dick by not thinking about others. Too many partners can indeed lead to a desensitization of what sex can do for you, do for others, what it means, how good it can be at the best of times, and how bad it can be at the worst of times.
 
It’s an interesting avenue of thought that at the very least makes me grateful for finally figuring out what to do as opposed to just hitting up Craigslist for another in a long line of cocks.
 
Masturbate when pointlessly horny and save the sexin’s for when they’ll really matter. Again, casual sex isn’t bad, just don’t be a slut like me (and even though I’m still disease-free, be safer than me too, y’all).
Mooncalf
The End wasn't The End - Found a new home after the great exodus of 2012

@AlsoSprachOdin  
You make valid points, but you’re making the mistake of seeing this as an either/or concept - that a woman can either be a pure virgin saving herself for ‘the right one’, or an uninhibited slut giving herself up for anyone or everyone. The prototypical ‘madonna/whore’. In reality, there’s plenty of middle way.
 
Sex can be good, and sex can be fun. And sex is magnitudes better when it’s with someone you care about, because emotional attachment plays a much bigger part than most people think. But you can care about more than one person in your whole life. I don’t believe that there’s exactly one person out there who’s your destined soul mate, and if you spend your whole life waiting for Mr/Miss Right to knock on your door, you’ll miss out on a lot of opportunities for happiness, and will probably end up very lonely. Yes, meaningless sex may desensitize you, but that will happen no matter how much or little there is.
 
If you’re concerned that you may mean less to your partner because he/she has had several others before you, then that is your issue to deal with. You can feel less special as ‘just another ride’ if you want. Or you can consider that you’re the one that really means something to them. Just because you’re their first doesn’t mean that you magically become the best they could ever have, and they definitely won’t be your best one, because they are, in a word, inexperienced. Yes, we all remember our first time, but that’s because it’s our first time, not because it’s particularly good. Chances are you’re glamorizing it in retrospect, and subconsciously edit out the bad bits - the fumbling, the awkwardness, the way it ended quicker than we thought. (No, this is not a personal attack. We all have inflated expectations from the movies.) You can have a healthy, satisfying relationship with a person who’s had sex with others before, as long as you don’t let yourself get bogged down by emotional baggage. Does it really matter that much to you that your wife slept with her old boyfriend once back in high school ten years ago, when she’s now claiming to be happy and committed to living with you? If it does, then maybe the problem lies with you, not her.
 
I cannot see why marrying virgins would lead to lower divorce rates, because divorces happen for plenty of reasons not always related to sexual satisfaction. The only correlation I can see is that societies where marrying a virgin is expected also stigmatize divorces, thus dropping the rates. And that’s not exactly a good thing.
 
Yes, common sense is a must when choosing a partner, as is protection. STDs and unwanted pregnancies are obvious dangers, but they’ve been obvious dangers for as long as our species has existed. We have protection for both genders, and most societies today have no real objections about using them. Being a little sensible in picking your partner(s) will allow you to minimize risks fairly well, too.
 
I’m not saying that we should encourage people to have rampant sex without any thought to consequences, but neither am I saying that they should keep their legs clamped together 24/7 to avoid irrevocably tainting their purity. It’s very, very sensible to recognize that you don’t have to take every opportunity for sex, no matter what your hormones say, but if the situation is good, and you judge the conditions right (your partner is very most likely disease-free, you have protection, and you both feel genuinely attracted to each other) then the choice to go ahead should be yours, not society’s.
 
An frankly, a society where a woman is considered ‘ruined’ or ‘tainted’ after one act is not a society I want to be part of. Particularly since no such stigma is ever expressed for men. Besides, it’s not as though the virginity has any practical use.
AlsoSprachOdin

@Mooncalf  
You know, given a bit of time to think this shit over, I’m thinking that, while sex isn’t everything, it probably still is a pretty important way of bonding. Especially for females, given the levels of oxytocin they get from sex. Particularly the first time is something people rarely forget.  
And I think that if you’ve had several sexual partners, you might become desensitized and the sexual bonding all the less effective.  
Should we really dismiss the merit of partners not having had previous partners out of hand? It does ensure against STDs, some emotional baggage, and talks about their exes.  
Also, if the prevalent romantic culture was to hook up with virgins, that sort of implies fewer break-ups / lower divorce rates. If men only went for virgins, women would probably divorce less.  
Anyway, the important thing is that people stay together, not that they have the best sex they can have. People can survive without sex, but without companionship children tend wither and die, whereas adults sicken physically and mentally, and often commit suicide, to escape feelings of isolation and loneliness.  
So if sex can be used to keep people together (and more children can be raised by both a mother and a father) maybe there is something to be said for finding a virgin.  
Just a few thoughts. Feedback appreciated.
 
@Joseph Raszagal  
The image inspired stimulating conversation.
Mooncalf
The End wasn't The End - Found a new home after the great exodus of 2012

Marrying a virgin is great - if you want to preserve your male pride by ensuring that your wife cannot compare you to a better lover. To a virgin, you’ll always be the best, because she lacks any frame of reference.
 
If that pride is the only thing that motivates you to get up in the morning and be a productive individual to society, then I cannot think very highly of you.
Antonyourknee
Non-Fungible Trixie -
My Little Pony - 1992 Edition
Wallet After Summer Sale -

A waste of biomatter
@AlsoSprachOdin  
I also predict the Vice President will revel himself as alien drone spy,and push the button causing a nuclear with Russia (led by Putin who is secretly a Lyger in a man suit) thus destroying the hopes and dreams of every man,women and child who hoped for more from our species on this rotten dirtball floating in the void.
AlsoSprachOdin

@Antonyourknee  
What good are the trees gonna do otherwise? Look pretty? Those decorations are planted along the road outside my door, and they aren’t cut down for timber by the thousands. Far as I know.  
What does the ozone-layer have to do with the global warming? And hasn’t it been a while since this was an issue?  
The global warming fraud is there to fill the pockets of a lot of different people, among others the hacks in the scientific community that receive money to study the “effects” of global warming.  
There’s pollution, and then there’s using “environment-friendly bio-gas” that incidentally produces even more carbon dioxide than just using regular gas would have. The people behind that are making money on global warming, as are the people who make windmills and solar cells.  
“so they can steal my files” - well, I think that’s a legit concern. Snowden, anyone?  
And I’ve not seen these commercials you mention, because I don’t watch television. And probably also because I’m not ‘murican.  
The only real concern regarding fossil fuels should be the limited availability of them, and while oil will inevitably become too expensive for normal people not to buy electric cars, the US alone has enough coal to cover the energy consumption of the entire world for the next 300 years.  
It’ll certainly be interesting to see where we’ll be by then. Or it’ll be really boring and depressing.
Antonyourknee
Non-Fungible Trixie -
My Little Pony - 1992 Edition
Wallet After Summer Sale -

A waste of biomatter
@AlsoSprachOdin  
Who cares if global warming is fraud?,does that mean its now okay to cut down thousands of trees a day and to pollute our atmosphere with tons of poisonous and ozone depleting gases,after all “global climate change is a  
Fraud made up by the “man” to force me to buy expensive ligth bulbs and get a crappy Prius hell to the that,I ain’t gonna recycle my cell phone so they can steal my files or make me recycle at all,it’s just a scam so the” man” can reuse materials to save money while making crappier products! And now I’m gonna invest in fracking cause everyone knows that natural gas is a completely safe and efficient non-blowy up when not wanting to fuel source,after all just look at those happy people on the commercial talking about Americas’s future and how great we are for being awesome!
Antonyourknee
Non-Fungible Trixie -
My Little Pony - 1992 Edition
Wallet After Summer Sale -

A waste of biomatter
@AlsoSprachOdin  
All this talk of virgins and civilization is irrelevant,for all that makes up our culture,the expectations ,the ideas,the customs will be lost in the next 10-20 years when the pharmaceutical companies corporatized genetic alteration to distract mankind from the inevitable environmental catastrophe that’s will destroy global stability and when the survivors use the splicing products to alter themselves biologically to survive in our new carbon-methane enriched world where mutants roam the Wasteland ,any concept of marriage and virginty is lost on them as they reproduce asexually through spores so that they can survive the annual floods . So get ready to debate about the advantages of two hearts or three kidneys to go hunt the giant hamster people of north Arkansas.