Uploaded by Killian_Joy 
1248x1383 JPG 253 kB
Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
Her hair is the exact color of that girls shirt… This is not a coincidence.
Source
not provided yet
Probably got overshadowed by other films that took one piece of it and made it the entire movie.
Saw it, couldn’t get into it.
Back to work
>A Shock to the System
You know, you are the second person I know of that has ever mentioned that film. It wasn’t even bad. Why do so few people talk about it?
It’s essentially Fight Club crossed with American Psycho. But ten years before either of those!
You can only push The Quiet Ones so far…before they turn around and strike you down!
You know, I have always wondered if people seriously think responding “I don’t care what you think” will make anyone actually think they don’t care what others think.
Also, please suggest better and relevant movies. In your case, I suggest instead a book. It’s 1984 and it’s not suppose to be an instruction manual. Please keep this mind while thinking about what other think you want to force other people to think.
Go watch the movie Conspiracy (it’s a made for TV movie)
Learn how to properly express a coherent thought.
And then realize how little your malformed opinion matters to me.
Meanwhile I have work to do. We shall meet on the Hastings.
Why would I? Bender describes it quite nicely. An people telling you that you must assume because you never know is ironic by definition. Hypocritical, if you wish to argue that situational irony (where events don’t reflect the intent or expected outcome) isn’t a thing.
Go look up irony
No it doesn’t. Assumptions are a natural part of the human experience and more often than not produce more good than harm. To claim people cannot use their experience or the one of others to make personal judgements, however wrong they might be, is much worse than moral busybodies spending their time telling you that you’re wrong. It’s telling people what to think and to ignore reality in favour of whatever stupid phrase people wish to make hold true, in the weirdest game of irony invented by man.
Assume
makes and ass of you and me
I think you know what I mean, though.
Differences in how we treat others should be based on an individual basis, not based on what race/sex/sexuality/etc. they are.
So you support Equality of Opportunity, not Equality of Outcome.
I foresee asking someone to clarify which one they support becoming an important follow-up question.
I don’t think they should be treated equally. I think they need the same rights. On a person to person basis, nobody should be treated equally, some people earn more respect, payment, and so on based on what they do.
Saying, I treat everyone equally is stupid.
Speaking as a feminist myself, I don’t think the name’s the important thing.
If we both agree that men and women should be treated equally, then what we call ourselves isn’t really the important part.
I consider myself an egalitarian and a feminist, but like I said, labels are labels. What’s important is the philosophy behind those labels; In our shared case, the belief that gender should not determine how you are treated by others.
positively reciprocates to the gesture
Brohoof!
Then you should be egalitarian, not feminist. One of those is for equal rights, the other isn’t.
Thanks, that means a lot… And I’m not sure… She never really had a direct conflict… (Discord confronted her a few times but I think it flew mostly over her head… Maybe if we challenge legalizing it? See how she reacts to that XD )
Not all nazis hated Jews.
But we don’t talk about the dude from the end of the pianist.
Its a joke based on the fact that enough did for it to become a noticeable trait.
Kinda like how white people love Rachel Ray and are terrified of curses
(Parks and rec joke)
Not all of them.
Tree Hugger certainly doesn’t seem like that militant variety.
Hippies actually did that too… A lot.