Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Champions of Equestria

Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!

Description

No description provided.

suggestive190977 artist:tomatocoup349 bow hothoof1420 windy whistles2902 pegasus497666 pony1605307 g42031824 and that's how rainbow dash was made48 awww228 bed57953 blushing274702 chest fluff65685 cowgirl position10090 cute266147 dilf452 duo170884 eyes closed139247 female1805731 flag5645 freckles44076 good clean married sex2118 heart76697 husband and wife2373 male551714 mare742878 married744 married couple1718 married couples doing married things548 married life108 milf13355 rainbow dash's parents385 sex171994 ship:windyhoof377 shipping254542 simple background597649 softcore3820 spread wings94801 stallion196089 straight179460 unshorn fetlocks46992 white background162413 windybetes313 wing hands2981 wing hold693 wingboner9662

Comments

Syntax quick reference: **bold** *italic* ||hide text|| `code` __underline__ ~~strike~~ ^sup^ %sub%

Detailed syntax guide

Background Pony #903D
In North America, “Rooting for you” means “Cheering for you.”
In New Zealand, “Root” means “Fuck.”
Bow and Windy seem to put both together.
Trick Question
Magical Inkwell - Wrote MLP fanfiction consisting of at least around 1.5k words, and has a verified link to the platform of their choice

@Mooniedrop  
The comments I replied to were comments directed at me personally. I’m just slow at responding sometimes.
 
@Darth Sonic  
There aren’t any current studies because the “research” you’re quoting is bunk, and there isn’t any evidence to impel more research in that direction.
 
All I’m trying to point out is that the veracity of your sources is important. It has to be scientific to be scientific.
Trick Question
Magical Inkwell - Wrote MLP fanfiction consisting of at least around 1.5k words, and has a verified link to the platform of their choice

@Background Pony #4319  
@Mooniedrop  
It’s not ‘which institutions’, it’s whether or not a study passes peer review. The peer review system is designed to filter out unscientific garbage.
 
Here’s an actual scientific study from 1975: http://www.jstor.org/stable/583035
 
Things have improved substantially since then because the topic is no longer nearly as taboo now as it was 42 years ago. There aren’t a lot of research studies on the topic, however, because it’s not a common situation and there isn’t substantial evidence that it produces any specific difficulty in child-rearing or other family dynamics. So no, the assertion that “people in open marriages have problems” is inaccurate—and even if it weren’t, saying it in that way is prejudicial toward those of us (like me) who live in an open marriage and have no problems in our relationship at all.
Mooniedrop

@TricksterWolf  
what instituitions collate statistics that are acceptable to you? im pretty sure everyone can no-platform an opponents source of statistics. its pretty easy, after all, you just did it without expending even 20 calories and providing zero proof.
Background Pony #E4FA
@TricksterWolf  
Please provide a link to a credible publication then. Everything I happen to find comes from seemingly biased (one way or the other) sources.