@Background Human
Oh I wish we had guns that worked via computers and negative-mass accelerators, but am unfortunately doubtful that we’d ever be able to make negative-mass. If possible, they’d certainly be better than current designs which rely upon mechanics and chemistry.
It does raise questions about how gun control would work when the operating mechanism (which is what’s more regulated in all countries) is controlled by computers than by physical parts…
@Scrabbleman
Did you even watch the video linked?
Or this one? Or
this one? It isn’t 2012 anymore, and we can make viable guns pretty reliably now. Granted, it’s not yet
press a button and then you have a gun, but for anyone who can follow instructions, they aren’t difficult to make; certainly easier than Lutys or Stens, which ignorant fuckwits usually retort with, but have yet to actually make themselves.
@Latecomer
You can’t, and if you think that you can, you automatically forego the right to ever criticise the tactics employed by the CCP to abuse their citizens, because that’s the kind of controls you’d need to even attempt to control this.
Some food for thought: the guy who’s helping develop homemade smokeless gunpowder is
from China, and has demonstrated his results with actual guns. If the most powerful government on the planet can’t do it, why would you think less powerful ones would be more successful?