@Latecomer
The standard is high because one actually needs to find out
for sure if such a phenomenon (in America, or any other country in the world where it is alleged to exist but hasn’t yet been proven to exist, currently) actually, indisputably exists.
You
cannot just
assume things about the situation and then expect to be taken seriously by anybody who
actually knows just exactly
why and
how making assumptions (
and generalizations) about
any serious situation like the murder of George Floyd, because that is an absolutely unsound,
dishonest, and
disingenuous way of trying to figure something out and then acting like
you’re (not necessarily you in particular, just anybody who does this shit, in general) an expert on the entire situation.
I’ve actually been saying this for the past 3-4 years now, and even more so following the death of George Floyd. And honestly, it really does end up getting to be real grating and tiring at times to essentially feel like one of the only non-conservative, right-wing, or far-right people in the entire world who seems to actually understand this shit.
(Note: After reading Ciaran’s response post to me, I’m definitely most curious about whether or not this post, in particular, somehow violates any certain rule—or rules—in the thread, because so far, I do not see anything in this post that is either violating rule #0, rule #6, or any other rule, for that matter, or isn’t related at all to politics because it is critiquing the rampant and unproven-to-be-warranted concept of systemic racism, which, judging by how the posts who talk about the concept in this thread like mine, right here, are not deleted—along with it always being used in a political manner in the outside world—is definitely a political topic.)