@Shimauma
Yet it is more effective to discredit the intolerance than silencing it. If you silence that intolerance,you will be opening the pathway to expand what can be seen as intolerant.
Just because you have to let everyone getting a voice doesn’t mean that you support that standpoint.
You fall under the fallacy that freedom of speech implies a weaponized medium for the fascists to become a bigger force when that’s not true.
Freedom of speech implies: responsibility, huge amounts of knowledge and overcoming constantly the argument of your opponent, no matter what political standpoint delivered.
Otherwise, everyone would be become a fanatical of looking for the most tolerant speech by eliminating the intolerants. You defeat an intolerant with more speech because if you don’t do that, you will eventually become blind withing your thoughts and you won’t understand where those thought comes from in the first. It will lead to confusion,then fear and finally, hate. People hate freedom because it implies a challenge and getting out of the comfort zone quite a few times.
The world always offers obstacles and it forces you to be wiser than the challenge itself.
Perhaps, some of those who desire censorship might not have been educated nor prepared enough in order to face the harsh reality. The world doesn’t work in the way that you want it to be. You won’t eliminate the fascists by simply censoring them. You’ve got to remember where they came up with those thoughts and after letting them to express themselves,then you come up with better arguments than the ones that they have (it requires way more effort to adapt this strategy though).
Censorship leads to authoritarian regimes sooner or later.