Posts

Large butts.

seeing Garble fucking his penis on Rarity’s pussy make me feel so bitter.(Thanks to that, it gave me the opportunity to take sleeping pills.) maybe am I the only one weird? Besides me, who doesn’t like watching Garble fuck his penis in Rarity’s pussy?
How many such people are there?

I try to tag my more… fetish-y commissions from people with as much as I can. The Applejack and Dash as ponut revealing lifeguards, has the explicit tag as well as the ponut tag in case people don’t want to see realistic horse genitalia. Meanwhile for some with human vaginas I think they should all be tagged with the human vagina on pony tag.
I don’t have too much filtered out aside from shippings I don’t like (GTFO ZephDash and SoarinDash) or fetishes I don’t get as well as Grimdark to an extent, sick of seeing Cupcakes pics or cannibalism.

I’m not a fan of the Barbie mugshot meme. A few have gotten through my filter.

@Wiimeiser
Point proven with this example lol.

A BP usually does this the most just to hurry and post something for clicks, likes and favs that’s more than likely not their art and will have others tag everything afterwards (they also sometimes will do this to merge the image with an older one because of either image quality or to bring relevance back to an old image). Thankfully it’s not a NSFW image, but tagging at least the basic stuff aside from species, artist tag, rating tag and character names is too much for BPs to handle.

On the topic of undertagging, we have images like >>3129329

That’s really helpful thank you :)

@PUBLIQclopAccountant
Behold, our relative time search term:

It takes times like “3 years ago” and “1 hour ago”. The lte and gte makes sense best if you remember that computer systems “understand” time stamps as long numbers (essentially counting seconds since “moment 0” of UNIX time), so lte refers to the smaller time number i.e. farther into the past, and gte refers to the larger time number i.e. not so far into the past.

edit I/ For “69 minutes or older” i.e. “uploaded at 69 minutes from now or earlier”, use created_at.lte:69 minutes ago.

edit II // It also takes absolute dates too, so terms like created_at.gt:2020are also possible.

@LightningBolt
Oh I see

@Conversed Corruption
I forgot to click reply.

@Jade Kitsune
Snailification? Woah that’s a new one

@LightningBolt
Just because this is open for NSFW discussion doesn’t mean I’m gonna personally throw sexual words around like hot cakes so I censored them. Now my turn…why didn’t you just reply to me instead of ghosting the question to me?

Snailification.

This is a NSFW thread why did you spoiler those words?

@LightningBolt
I have vaginal and anal blocked, but tags like straight, lesbian or gay that don’t have their tags can be a problem too.

@PUBLIQclopAccountant
Yes exactly that right there.

Can we not search for relative date/times? I was about to suggest a query to hide uploads made within the past two hours (or something like that) to give a chance for the tagging addicts to do their work. However, I did not see anything suggesting that created_at.lte:69minutes would work in the search syntax documentation. I suggested that as it seems that a tag_count.lte:5 wouldn’t catch everything @Conversed Corruption is looking for—they are tagged, just not with the right things.

While I’m here, one other tagging-related feature request to remind myself to post when I make my big round-up in the feature request thread: require uploads to have at least one species tag OR have the no pony tag. Unsure whether that should be a hard block on the upload or simply present an “are you sure?” message.

People often don’t tag straight or vaginal as they see them as ‘normal’ and `default’ and only ever think to tag anything else, but even then, not always. It’s incredibly frustrating and what I feel like I spend a vast majority of my time here doing.

@Conversed Corruption
What you’re describing sounds like the equivalent of people forgetting to tag “pony” on show-style images: it’s something so obvious that they never think to tag it. “Explicit” trivially implies “sex” in their minds.

@saby
Good to know about the reporting. Don’t worry I don’t block an entire artist over this mistake personally, but I will sometimes hide the image if I don’t add the tag. This isn’t an attack on the staff or anyone new to uploading and tagging here. It’s directed towards mostly the BPs that quickly throw in a few generic tags under an explicit image involving full intercourse and calling it a day, a method they use to get others to fill in all of the missing tags for that image. Saw an explicit NSFW image a month back or just recently where someone had to fill in 15+ tags because the image only had the species, artist name, rating tag and the color of the pony’s mane.

@PUBLIQclopAccountant
Oh they’ll also add other sexual tags to it which is hit or miss, believing that it’s enough to describe intercourse, but it’s easier if they add sex to their tags if the picture is showing it.

@PUBLIQclopAccountant
They’re minimal or I wouldn’t have brought this up which seems to have brought attention here. They’re most definitely not tagged properly. You may just not have been looking at those pictures as they’re uploaded, but they’ve been steadily becoming a snowball effect lately and the pictures will even sit around for an hour or so with no one or the uploader rechecking the tags to cover their boundaries yet. I’ll usually see others here have to fill in what the uploader of the explicit picture never bothered to do. Making mistakes on minor fetishes or kinks is such is one thing, but full on visible intercourse, a big primary tag for NSFW content is something I don’t want to see. The ‘sex’ tag is what I have filtered. They’ll upload the image and put silly tags like “duo”, “laying down”, “blue mane” and several other minor tags aside from ‘explicit. Remember that BPs are mostly the ones guilty of this. If I filtered out either the artist or the explicit tag then I’m either blocking some of their SFW content or consensual not thrown in your face nudity which is what I’m fine with.

@Conversed Corruption @Wiimeiser
Out of curiosity, are these images truly minimal tags or are they otherwise well-tagged but somehow manage to miss the big ticket items?

you can add this to your complex filters

to avoid having to filter out entire artists just because the people uploading their stuff are garbage at tagging.

And of course, when you run into uploads with insufficient tagging, especially if the missing tags include very basic stuff like sex, orientation, whether sex acts are happening, and big ticket fetishes—please report such images once in a while. As things are, staff has no way to automatically look for those images once tags have been added.

@PUBLIQclopAccountant
They definitely tag the character, which is why I end up seeing them.