Commentary on the poll results:
Poll 0:
Not any more of hate speech than Patrisse Cullors’s “zionism = anti-blackness”, still closest it gets to rule 0.
Slur usage not directed at real people is not hate speech, racist characters are not racist people
Ditto.
Ditto.
Ditto.
Ditto.
Ditto.
Ditto. Also, low artistic merit, it’s a screencap with words put on it.
The first piece of (mockery of) real propaganda, but in meme format. My opinion on propaganda is still the same: tag and filter.
Poll 1:
Turbo blatantly obvious joke. They’re dabbing, for fuck’s sake.
grimderp
, also “implied snuff”. Don’t see how it’s worse than actual snuff on the site.
Also a derp, not seeing artistic merit. Only hate speech/propaganda if you consider hating bronies to be such.
Non-specific and misrepresented execution by gas with ponies. Filters (including downvotes-filter and score-filter) can handle it.
A joke, not hate speech or propaganda.
The entire series of these images is dedicated to poor taste jokes. Also, actually kinda funny.
Another joke.
Racist characters are not racist people.
Piper Perri surrounded with Aryanne literally cannot be anything but mockery of Aryanne/nazism. Not rule 0.
Poll 2: obligatory joke about “larger swastika = more people vote against”
Not propaganda. But might be rule-3‘able depending on what else that artist drew.
Not propaganda. Also literally “Nazi OC, done with as many swastikas and Nazi symbols as possible. “
Not propaganda.
Not propaganda.
Finally, actual propaganda! And also effectively mockery of real Nazi propaganda. Also the pages on the table are funny.
Another piece of actual propaganda, apparently done for a set of pictures labelled “Storm Ponies” about ponies who are also nazis. Not rule 0, doesn’t actually propagandize nazism to users.
Edited screencap is not rule 0
Ditto.
Ditto.
Aryanne is a mockery of nazism and isn’t doing anything propagandistic, not rule 0.
Does Donald Duck count as fine art? Either way, a parody of classical-by-now work, not rule 0.
Aryanne is a mocblahblahblah
Literally only “nazi” thing in the picture is the swastika in background, and the pic itself would not change from any other symbol. Not rule 0.
Stylistic suck. Still not rule 0, downvotes and filters can handle it.
Parody of Hitler’s speech with porn, picture wouldn’t change with a different “fluff” though. Not rule 0.
Porn. No more R0 than if it was Veronika.
Ditto.
Ditto.
A very well-done animation that has no hate speech or propaganda in it whatsoever.
Final Opinion: there are exactly 0 (zero) images presented that I would have deleted for rule 0 in the polls. Therefore, I can reasonably assume that nazi images I would delete have been, and therefore in my opinion, rule 0 does not require any adjustment of wording from how it’s been for the last six years.
ALSO. The poll is biased by only showing images that have been kept, that is, it is about “how to make rule 0 more enforced”, and I am against that on principle.
BRING OUT SOME IMAGES TAGGED “NAZI” THAT WERE ACTUALLY DELETED FOR RULE 0 OVER THE YEARS FOR A FAIR ASSESSMENT.