Posts

Day 2. I really liked her mane in this scene.
 

 
A little bit more rushed than I’d have liked, but I’ve had an extremely busy day.

It’s right here: >>1150324
 
Now quit re-uploading it.

@galaxy news  
No
 
Also, remember to capitalize the start of a sentence and use a subject.

You uploaded a duplicate, it got merged into the original.

This sounds like it’ll be fun, so count me in! >>1149968
 
Like Lunar though, I already know there’s gonna be several days when I won’t be able to participate due to real life reasons and such. But I’ll try to do as many as I can.

@DragonWraith  
Nah, it’s already gone. I have a “destroy this tag” button :D
 
That actually works better too - simply untagging it doesn’t cause the tag to stop existing, it’d still be referenced in filters, watch lists, tag history, etc, so the tag is still in the database. Destroying it completely removes the tag, so it’s a lot cleaner.

comment_count.gt:100 isn’t a tag, it’s just a search operator. We can’t alias those at all.
 
Really, comments galore probably should be destroyed, it’s in the same boat as “upvotes galore”, “downvotes galore”, and “wall of faves”

@Dogman15  
K. Also, voting on an image forces it to be reindexed, so if you see that happen, just vote in it (or change your vote and then change it back), and it should appear afterwards.
 
@ZONESS  
Solidude’s correct - two different things, people just aren’t using them correctly.

@Kappe  
After reviewing it, I decided that the implication is valid enough, and I’m not removing it.

@Soarinjack  
@DragonWraith  
“Words” and “Text” had a ton of overlap, so there wasn’t any consistent separation between the two tags. Alias added.
 
@Background Pony #08C5  
There seems to be disagreement on this, and to be entirely honest, the tags are so disused that it’s not even worth me trying to figure out if it should/shouldn’t be aliased/implied/whatever.
 
@Background Pony #86DA  
What @Mildgyth said.
 
@cheezedoodle  
@DragonWraith  
@gallagher117  
Done

@toxicitzi  
@Brokedownandmadeone
 
Generally we don’t imply characters to their canon species. For example, you don’t tag “griffon” on a picture of just Gilda, but you would if it was another non-griffon character in griffon form. At least I’m pretty sure that’s how it’s supposed to work.
 
@DragonWraith  
I have no idea what that is, but ok.
 
 
@Background Pony #6BA3  
Chickun -> excellent way to get banned

@Solitude  
@DanielTepesKraus  
@Ciaran  
Done
 
(I’m getting called away, I’ll do the rest later)

@tvc  
@ZONESS  
@Napsack  
Done
 
@Background Pony #DD20  
I’m pretty sure this was suggested before and we decided not to for some reason. I’m not sure what though.
 
@Zero Takenaka  
There is no Sweetiebot tag, only Sweetie Bot.

@Badumsquish  

 
I never noticed that before. I guess I know what I’m doing tomorrow…

@Kirb  
Not really, no. There’s no sort by tag change option.
 
The site does have a public IRC channel that “live tweets” a lot of the public interactions on the site (tag changes, new images, etc). And I have an IRC client that is on 24/7 and logs everything written to that channel. So the best I could offer you is this snippet of logs of the “featured image” tag being added to pictures. It should line up pretty well with when an image was featured, but it’s not really an ideal way to browse it either: linky

How about the ability for there to be multiple sources on an image? Either have an unlimited number (textbox with one source per line), or just add 2-3 additional source URL boxes?
 
It’d be highly beneficial for artists who post their art in multiple locations (DA/Tumblr/IB/FA), but don’t have a verified account on Derpibooru linking all those pages. Since uploaders don’t always know of/list alternative sources for an image in the description, and description editing is locked to the uploader, it kinda makes it hard to advertise other places to find the artist’s other works. Having multiple sources, where anyone can edit them, would make it a lot easier.

@Kirb  
It’s definitely allowed. There’s a number of artists who post all/some of their art only on Derpibooru. :)

Just go to your edit profile page, and the options for your avatar are at the bottom.

@dt  
Because “Science Twilight” was already aliased into “Human Twilight”, so it didn’t make sense for “Sci-Twi” to not be aliased.
 
I don’t know who did the original alias, but I imagine they had good reason to.

@Keith Mowz  
He doesn’t have a verified artist links.
 
He’s not logged into the site once in ten months either, so…

@ArkyNoid  
You seem to be pretty persistent that we either call out, publicly shame, or otherwise identify who is behind anon posting. Let me just clear this up so there’s no misunderstanding:
 
IT’S NOT HAPPENING
 
Duck badges are given to people who openly and ceaselessly stir up trouble. If someone occasionally shitposts as anon, but normally behaves themselves, they get banned for a day or three, and then no one cares afterwards.

@Blissey1  
Ringo is never really anonymous though. His style of shitposting is unique enough that whenever he is hiding behind anon, we get 3-5 reports saying “I think this is Ringo again”.

@ArkyNoid  
I can ban someone easily without announcing to the entire world who they are.

Ya’ll realize we do take privacy seriously here, right? Even if someone is using anon to be an ass, it would be a very rare occurrence for us to publicly out them.