@Archonix This is pretty much why when I see someone say they’re a ‘social’
anything I know immediately they’re an enemy of mankind and probably need to be dealt with urgently and harshly. My own home was turned into an impregnable fortress with barbed wire and boarded windows after two such occurrences in the township. Basically no other children were going
anywhere with social workers without the national guard being mobilised (and a good half of those children were willing to die fighting them too!) They did manage to nab me while I was skipping from (middle) school once at a mall (amusing how to a lot of people it looked like a trafficking ring abduction!) but I expressed my distaste for the situation by nicking the stapler from a social worker’s desk and giving her a concussion. They must have had a large caseload that day since instead of trying to jam me into an ‘at risk’ program or something as they normally do I just got two days in juvie and then let go.
When I see CPS it to me means “We’ll break up perfectly normal working families with loving parents (especially if they’re from a non-government-sanctioned Christian sect) for hyper-exaggerated reasons, but we’ll ignore actual abuse and molestation because
dealing with that is just so haaaaahd teehee.’ There’re probably good ones out there that do try to make the foster care system like, not suck, but same as ‘good feminists’ I’ve never met them, never seen them, never even heard anyone mention them in a good light until I got the internet even, and it feels like they are a mythical creature created by elders past to convince themselves or tiny gullible children that life couldn’t suck equally everywhere. You know, like the Easter Bunny and Santa. And the ‘good feminists’ online like Valenti and Ginmar and even our good buddy Tex don’t seem to be reppin’ that label too well either.
@NoodleNugget
To be fair, all those kooky ‘white nationalist’ groups are largely toothless now due to the way they conduct their violence, encouraging ‘lone wolf’ acts for plausible deniability and such. They
know damn well they lost big during the 60s, to the government and to populism, so you’re actually far safer within the mob than with just two or three members. They would never try and mass vigilante act in this day and age unless they assaulted a socially acceptable target. (That’s why you see a lot of them following the Westboro tact of counter-protest, where they will show up in force in a
whatever parade’s route, or intermingling with larger protest groups like heckling PeTA and Scienos)
The real test of that rationale is supporting expatriate Iranian clerics.
@NoodleNugget Unfortunately decades of puritanical witchhunting, both from progressives and christian kooks both, have made the sensible solution of unisex restrooms a complete impossibility in any anglo-descent country and their occupied zones.
@NoodleNugget The pro-trans people are actually correct on doing it during the teen years. Your appearance is still ‘malleable’ during tutorial mode, but around 20-22 it becomes kind of set in biological stone and you begin producing the max load of T or E, barring horrendous drug and alcohol abuse, plastic surgery, or radioactive leeches. 18 is probably one of the worst ages to set the arbitrary barrier because so much opportunity for moulding, mentally and physically, has passed or is passing by at that moment. You can tell absolutely no neural research was done when the ‘adult age’ was setup, which is why I’m so vociferously against it. (not to mention a good half of the shit that becomes legal then ought not to have been restricted, or restricted that far in the first place, which goes hand-in-hand with puritanical thought control.)
