@Background Pony #C625
It absolutely does not. If you had read the book you would know that the government in the book consists of elected representatives, and that anyone even disabled people could receive the right to vote provided that they worked for 2 years in a hard job they arguably knew how to do. To add to that the government in the book is
obligated to provide work to that person even if they are severely disabled. So no they are not fascist.
First of all, I have read the book. More than once. I own a copy, even, so I’ll thank you not to suggest I’m unfamiliar with the text.
Secondly, you’re ignoring the fact that the book outright states that the ability to vote and hold public office can only be earned through “Federal Service” (which almost entirely seems to involve serving in the military, as far as the story itself concerned) and that the jobs the government of the book is obligated to provide are reserved for the veterans of said service. And given that one of the aspects of a fascist state is the existence of a martial government where those governing are of the same fascist party, it’s not hard to see why the idea that the book is in some way advocating fascism exists, regardless of whether you agree with the interpretation or not.
Third, even putting the voting issue aside, there are other similarities between things that are discussed or referenced in the book and fascist concepts. The protagonist is taught on multiple occasions to view violence as a necessity and to reject many of the negative associations that go along with it. The human society in the book is implied to rely on the military conquest of other races and expansion of their territory to keep from destroying themselves. Also, the “coming of age” aspect of the story veers a little too close at times to sounding like the kind of outright indoctrination and propaganda fascist states frequently employ.
So going back to my original response, yes, there are absolutely arguments to be made that it is in fact a fascist work. I’m not saying it absolutely is, because that’s a much larger, more involved debate, but it’s impossible to deny that those aspects exist and that the implication is there.