The fight against child abuse and the fight against fascism in the My Little Pony fandom are usually one and the same.
Many right-wing pony fans are willing to excuse and cover up he grooming of children if it means they can support someone with similar political views.
Was this common knowledge before he broadcasted it? If this was not common knowledge or this is him just revealing it outright then it severely disingenuous to say with that those that disputed knowingly covering for a pedophile for political reasons.
If he is just revealing it, I don’t think this should be dismissed out of hand however. Someone could have honestly approached him with this information and it could be 100% legit. The screencaps do not look good even under the most generous interpretation that he may have been trying to help her in some way, it does feel manipulative. Just because something is legal doesn’t make it ethical and at the very least should give someone pause.
You know what else what gives me pause? All the allegations of sexual misconduct that often were more complex and outright BS that have happened over the years. It’s not worth to take screencaps at face value in this day in age and one should be cautious with running with anything. Which is why, even if it was a previous incident that was known I still can’t fault people. This could have been something that he already addressed. It could be something that he already addressed but Woot has gotten some new information that cast doubt upon the story. I don’t know! No dog piling. No running with anything till more information can found. No going after the person making the allegation if that is uncovered! I should note that I have not heard of a official response from Chopsticks yet.
I do, however, have little respect for those who wish to change established communities into their safe space.
It depends, often it is a cynical power grab though it can be in earnest. This desire for change can arise from real problems within a community that has not been addressed. Communities do need a way to address issues and that ideology sadly offers a convenient toolkit as a first reaction when a community suffers something shocking or realizes a change may need to be made. What makes it truly problematic is that it itself often can’t deal with horrible people who say the right things and support the right causes.
organic off-topic spammers and the politically active often have similar behavioral patterns (distinct both from regular users and spambots).
I can believe that. Heck, I think I have noticed this pattern myself in another place though not a moderator position ||Though I have do have tiny amount of moderation experience. ||
hurts the unaligned residents far more than any of the participants and ruins the neighborhood.
** This. **
My guess is that in trying to pre emptively explain himself that some people saw that as a point to attack, maybe a sign of insecurity for them.
Perhaps. My only guess is that some in his friend group/followers weren’t fully aware of his taste, though, IDK, the way I have seen people talk about Chopsticks that he is knowing for being a bit of a troll. So much drama over a image with only 42 likes on twitter. This was no Apple Jack’s plantation that is for sure.